Upgrading Asterisk between major versions, such as from 1.2 to 1.4 or from 1.6.2 to 1.8 is akin to upgrading an operating system. Once a phone switch is in production, it is terribly disruptive for that system to be unavailable for nearly any length of time, and the upgrade of that phone system needs to be well thought-out, planned, and tested as much as possible prior to deployment. And because every deployment is different, it is difficult, if not impossible, for us to walk you through a real system upgrade. However, we can certainly point you in the right direction for the information you require in order to perform such an upgrade, thereby giving you the tools you need to be successful.
A production Asterisk system should never be upgraded between major versions without first deploying it into a development environment where the existing configuration files can be tested and reviewed against new features and syntax changes between versions. For example, it may be that your dialplan relies on a deprecated command and should be updated to use a new command that contains more functionality, has a better code base, and will be updated on a more regular basis. Commands that are deprecated are typically left in the code for backward-compatibility, but issues reported about these deprecated commands will be given lower priority than issues to do with the newer preferred methods.
There exist two files that should be read
prior to any system upgrade: CHANGES
and UPGRADE.txt
, which are shipped with the Asterisk source code. These
files contain details on changes to syntax and other things to be aware of
when upgrading between major versions. The files are broken into different
sections that reference things such as dialplan syntax changes, channel
driver syntax changes, functionality changes, and deprecation of
functionality, with suggestions that you update your configuration files
to use the new methods.
Another thing to consider when performing an upgrade is whether you really need to perform the upgrade in the first place. If you’re using a long-term support (LTS)[40] version of Asterisk and that version is happily working along for you, perhaps there is no reason to upgrade your existing production system. An alternative to upgrading the entire system is simply to add functionality to your system by running two versions simultaneously on separate systems. By running separate boxes, you can access the functionality added to a later version of Asterisk without having to disrupt your existing production system. You can then perform the migration more gradually, rather than doing a complete system upgrade instantly.
Two parts of Asterisk should be thoroughly tested when performing an upgrade between major versions: the Asterisk Manager Interface (AMI) and the Asterisk Gateway Interface (AGI).
These two parts of Asterisk rely on testing your code to make sure any cleanup of syntax changes in either the AMI or the AGI, or added functionality, does not interfere with your existing code. By performing a code audit on what your program is expecting to send or receive against what actually happens, you can save yourself a headache down the road.
The testing of call detail records (CDRs) is also quite important, especially if they are relied upon for billing. The entire CDR structure is really designed for simple call flows, but it is often employed in complex call flows, and when someone reports an issue to the tracker and it is fixed, it can sometimes have an effect on others who are relying on the same functionality for different purposes. Asterisk 1.8 now includes channel event logging (CEL), which is a system designed to get around some of the limitations of CDR in more complex call flows (such as those that involve transfers, etc.). More information about CEL is available in the section called “CEL (Channel Event Logging)”.
Upgrading Asterisk can be a successful endeavor as long as sufficient planning and testing are carried out prior to the full rollout. In some cases migrating to a separate physical machine on which you’ve performed testing is preferred, as it can give you a system to roll back to in case of some failure that can’t be resolved immediately. It’s the planning, and particularly having a backup plan, that is the most important aspect of an Asterisk upgrade.
[40] More information about Asterisk releases and their support schedule is available at https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Versions.